The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments tomorrow in a case involving 28 government contractors at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory who object to what they say are unrestricted and overly intrusive background checks.
The plaintiffs, who are engineers and scientists at the lab in Pasadena, say that their work is low-risk and unclassified, and therefore security clearance isn't required. The Justice Department has responded that the background checks are "minimally intrusive."
The suit was initiated in 2007. After the Federal District Court in Los Angeles dismissed it, the Ninth Circuit sided with the scientists and issued an emergency injunction putting a halt to the checks. The federal government appealed, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
JPL is run by the California Institute of Technology and is famous for for sending unmanned spacecraft to Mars and the outer solar system.
How intrusive? And wouldn't JPL have a great reason to be careful about who they employ?
Posted by: Joe | October 04, 2010 at 07:27 PM
I know this is really boring and you are skipping to the next comment, but I just wanted to throw you a big thanks - you cleared up some things for me!
Posted by: uggboots | November 04, 2010 at 06:45 PM
How extensive are the background checks that they are doing? I think that would vary the difference in how "intrusive" it would be.
Dee
Posted by: business lawyer los angeles | November 10, 2010 at 05:25 PM